<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terence’s Stuff: Multiple Linear Regression, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bulletin.imstat.org/2012/09/terence%E2%80%99s-stuff-multiple-linear-regression-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bulletin.imstat.org/2012/09/terence%e2%80%99s-stuff-multiple-linear-regression-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:58:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Digest &#8211; January 6, 2013 &#124; Robust Analysis</title>
		<link>http://bulletin.imstat.org/2012/09/terence%e2%80%99s-stuff-multiple-linear-regression-part-2/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Digest &#8211; January 6, 2013 &#124; Robust Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 03:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.imstat.org/?p=945#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>[...] Terence’s Stuff: Multiple Linear Regression, Part 2, Terry Steel I really like multiple linear regression (MLR), even though I think that it must be the most widely misused of all statistical methods. There are so many different reasons why we might use it, and there are so many variations on linear least squares, I feel that MLR can be seen as a microcosm of statistics as a whole. At a conference recently I heard a speaker discuss MLRs with 15–20 variables. He spoke of model complexity, of functional forms, of whether or not variables should be selected, and he discussed model (in)stability and resampling techniques for diagnosing and improving models.  All without stating a reason for doing MLR! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Terence’s Stuff: Multiple Linear Regression, Part 2, Terry Steel I really like multiple linear regression (MLR), even though I think that it must be the most widely misused of all statistical methods. There are so many different reasons why we might use it, and there are so many variations on linear least squares, I feel that MLR can be seen as a microcosm of statistics as a whole. At a conference recently I heard a speaker discuss MLRs with 15–20 variables. He spoke of model complexity, of functional forms, of whether or not variables should be selected, and he discussed model (in)stability and resampling techniques for diagnosing and improving models.  All without stating a reason for doing MLR! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
